How MIR Works

MIR doesn't prove you're good. It proves you're not new.

That's the difference. We don't vouch for anyone. We don't label anyone "trustworthy." We simply make history visible—or its absence.

The Scammer Problem

Every platform faces the same dilemma: How do you catch bad actors without creating a surveillance system that harms everyone?

Most solutions try to prove someone is bad—blacklists, bans, fraud scores. These create false positives, punish edge cases, and require platforms to make accusations they can't always prove.

MIR flips the question: instead of asking "is this person bad?" we ask "does this person have history?"

History is neutral. Having it isn't proof you're good. Not having it isn't proof you're bad. But patterns emerge, and context matters.

Two Types of People

Someone with history

100 completed transactions. 3 years of activity. Multiple platforms. No chargebacks. This person carries proof they've done this before.

Someone without history

Brand new account. No linked platforms. No prior transactions. This person might be new—or might be starting fresh after a ban.

Here's what MIR doesn't do: accuse anyone. A blank profile isn't a red flag—it's just blank. But blank isn't neutral anymore. It's the absence of signal, and that absence is itself information.

"I've never seen this person before" used to mean nothing. Now it means something.

Market Pressure Without Accusations

When history becomes portable, something interesting happens:

For people who want trust

Good actors can now prove they're not new. Your 5 years of perfect eBay feedback follows you to Facebook Marketplace. Your track record on one freelance platform opens doors on another. Trust becomes an asset you accumulate and carry.

For people avoiding trust

Bad actors face a choice: build real history (which means behaving well), or stay blank forever. Staying blank used to be free—everyone started at zero. Now, staying blank while others build history puts you at a disadvantage.

The economics shift

When the cost of having no history (reduced access, higher friction) exceeds the benefit of hiding (avoiding past behavior), bad actors either reform or get filtered out. No accusations required.

What We Don't Do

Understanding what MIR isn't is as important as understanding what it is:

How Identity Linking Works

A common question: does everyone need to use the same user ID everywhere? No. Each platform keeps their own system.

How it connects

eBay knows you as "ebay-user-12345". Etsy knows you as "etsy-shop-abc". Airbnb knows you as "guest-789". These stay separate—MIR links them behind the scenes when you choose to connect them.

The linking process

Partners never see each other's user IDs. They only see the aggregated reputation signals you've chosen to make portable. Your identity stays yours.

You've Seen This Before

The concept isn't new. MIR applies a proven pattern to internet trust:

MIR brings this pattern to the places that need it most: marketplaces, freelance platforms, rentals, communities—anywhere strangers transact.

The Bottom Line

Today's internet

Scammer gets banned, creates new account, starts fresh. Good user changes platforms, starts from zero. History trapped or erased at platform boundaries.

With MIR

Scammer gets flagged, can't escape by switching platforms. Good user carries proof of good behavior everywhere. History becomes portable—for better or worse.

We don't catch bad actors by labeling them bad.
We catch them by making good history valuable—and its absence visible.

Ready to build portable reputation?

Whether you're a user who wants to carry trust or a platform that wants to leverage it.